Friday, June 22. 2007quick review of Pixy vulnerability scanner for PEAR usersTrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Wow, haven't looked at Pixy in about a year myself... good to see it's gone past 2.0.
Did you try the web interface, or did you download and run it locally? I had toyed with it about a year ago on some internal work code, seeing what it picked up, and I don't remember any problems running it. If you downloaded it, look for me in the eclipse-usage.txt doc file
Greg, please email us the details of the issues that you encountered. We are very interested in solving problems and helping people use Pixy, but we need some information for that.
-- Nenad
Please send us the details of the problems you had with Pixy, so that we can solve these issues. We are very interested in improving our tool.
-- Nenad |
Calendar
CategoriesPopular EntriesSetting up your own PEAR channel with Chiara_PEAR_Server - the official way
(36) Do you develop a website? It is infinitely better to synchronize live and development sites using the PEAR Installer(25) How to put the FAIL in open source(22) doing the PEAR thing(19) Using PEAR 1.4.0 to install PEAR packages on a remote host(19) phpDocumentor and __get/__set/__call - give us your ideas (RFC)(17) PEAR now fits in a bottle: meet go-pear.phar(17) Mac OS X ships with security hole-laden PEAR - how to upgrade immediately(16) Introducing pecl extension phar(13) go-pear.phar works! In related news, PHP_Archive is now PHP 5.1.0+(12) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||